This is clearly wanting to have it both ways. She's touting him as a model Witness because he died from refusing blood, but she is using "worldly" courts to continue to milk collect money from his "worldly" employer.
One point not discussed is why did the guy have an accident? His truck "inexplicably" went off the road. Was it a problem with the truck or a problem with the driver? Is the employer liable for poor driving on the part of the deceased?
I think the employer paid enough money to the widow. The man clearly died because he refused treatment, not because of the accident.
Dave, the harvesting issue is a non-issue because it will never happen...